The Controversial Intersection of SCP and A24’s V/H/S Franchise
Following the remarkable success of Backrooms, A24 is now attempting to capitalize on another viral internet horror sensation: a new installment in the V/H/S horror anthology series, set within the intriguing universe of the SCP Foundation. However, with the announcement of V/H/S: SCP, the project has already faced significant backlash, raising concerns over its viability and execution.
Understanding the SCP Foundation
The SCP Foundation is a prevalent creepypasta phenomenon that, similarly to the Backrooms, originated on 4chan. The fictional foundation is dedicated to documenting and containing various paranormal and supernatural anomalies through detailed documents that emulate government reports. This narrative framework creates a unique blend of sci-fi cosmic horror entwined with bureaucratic absurdities, making it particularly suitable for a monster-of-the-week style anthology.
Lack of Engagement with the SCP Community
A stark contrast exists between the approach A24 took with Backrooms — collaborating with creators from the YouTube community — and their current handling of the SCP project. A notable oversight occurred when the SCP Foundation Wiki publicly stated: “We have not had any communication with the filmmakers, producers, or distributors for this project, despite our best efforts.” This lack of outreach has contributed to a perception of alienation among fans and creators who help shape the SCP narrative.
DrEverettMann, an admin from the SCP Wiki, expressed frustration regarding A24’s silence, revealing, “We have made several attempts to contact them since the announcement of the project but haven’t received a response.”
The Challenge of Creative Commons Licensing
This situation is not merely a matter of community goodwill; it delves into the complexities of licensing. The SCP Foundation operates under a Creative Commons license, specifically CC BY-SA 3.0, which allows for the distribution and creation of derivative works, provided proper attribution is maintained. Consequently, this licensing structure complicates any substantial monetization efforts based on SCP materials.
A24 has already made missteps regarding copyright, previously angering fans by issuing claims against other Backrooms creators, before retracting them following intervention from director Kane Parsons. This history adds a layer of scrutiny to A24’s current plans. An Image Nation and Spooky Pictures spokesperson clarified, “A24’s worldwide rights pertain to the specific film project being produced.” However, this statement does not alleviate concerns regarding the broader implications of the Creative Commons license.
Legal Implications for A24’s SCP Project
Legal experts point out that under the current Creative Commons framework, filmmakers can freely create SCP-related films. However, A24 would face challenges in asserting exclusive rights to its adaptation since the license inherently permits others to create adaptations or redistribute the film. Paul Szynol, a law professor at the University of Michigan and Villanova, remarked, “the studio wouldn’t be able to stop anyone else from making adaptations of its film.” Such restrictions present an unusual challenge for a major studio aiming to maintain box office revenue.
DrEverettMann further elaborated, “The fact that anyone is able to distribute a CC BY-SA-licensed work means that the usual theatrical exclusivity wouldn’t apply. It is not possible for anybody to have exclusive rights to a film distributed under a CC BY-SA license.” This landscape complicates traditional distribution models, posing a fiscal risk to A24 should they move forward without appropriate measures in place.
Possible Outcomes for the Film Project
Considering the hurdles ahead, A24 has several paths they could pursue. They may choose to press on with the project as planned, facing potential legal repercussions later. Alternatively, they might abandon SCP branding, opting to draw “inspiration” from the source material without directly associating it with the Foundation. This approach has precedent in the industry, akin to the novel There is No Antimemetics Division, written by a contributor to SCP.
The boldest option would be to release the film under the ShareAlike license, accepting the prospect of sharing profits and creative rights with the community. While unconventional, it represents a possible compromise in a complex scenario.
In summary, as A24 forges ahead with V/H/S: SCP, the discourse around community engagement, legal obstacles, and ethical considerations continues to gain momentum. Fans, creators, and legal experts will watch closely to see how this story unfolds.
For more information, visit Here.
Image Credit: www.theverge.com
