Luigi Mangione Court Hearing Draws Public Attention
The first people in line on Tuesday, I was told, started camping out on the sidewalk two days ago. Luigi Mangione, the man accused of gunning down UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in December 2024, was due in court at 9 AM ET for a hearing in one of three concurrent criminal cases against him. And this time, everyone was prepared for the mayhem: the signs, the fans, the livestreamers, the protests, and the media circus. That’s why the line started even earlier than last time — the people who really wanted to get in to see him knew that no time was too early.
Ubiquitous Yet Fleeting Public Persona
Mangione is both ubiquitous and fleeting. The last time the public saw him (aside from a bizarre, unauthorized appearance in a men’s shirt listing on Shein) was in February at this same courthouse in Manhattan, when hundreds convened for a routine pretrial hearing. He exists in memes, in passing references, and in content moderation decisions, and he seemingly lives rent-free in the mind of Donald Trump — yet most people likely do not think about him daily. They are reminded of him when new photos drop or as incremental updates in the cases against him emerge. However, the wall-to-wall coverage of the case has waned, and it’s the most dedicated observers who are working to keep interest in the case alive. Mangione and the broader discussions around healthcare reform are one item in a list of approximately 8,000 pressing topics swirling in the US. This raises a critical question: How do you keep attention and energy alive in an information ecosystem defined by its fragmentation?
Lessons Learned from February’s Hearing
Court officials and police seem to have learned their lesson from February: don’t let a million people inside. The hearing on Tuesday was much more eventful than the previous month’s; Mangione’s team successfully got two terrorism-related charges tossed in the New York case, a development that supporters are celebrating. Given the magnitude of the news, the tempered atmosphere — and smaller crowds — was noticeable.
Instead of allowing members of the public into a hallway outside the courtroom where they could set up camp, the court opted to keep most on the sidewalk. There are fewer people here than in February, but in some ways, the supporters and frenzy are even more fervent. Mason Alexander, who told The Verge he’d been one of the few to make it inside the courtroom for the first hearing, arrived at 11 PM the night before and was 25th in line, meaning he wouldn’t get a spot this time. Some in line had numbers written on the backs of their hands, an unofficial system created by an attendee walking around with a marker, trying to bring order to the line.
The Magnitude of Healthcare Issues
“The case just resonated with me,” Alexander explains. “Obviously, what he allegedly did isn’t something to be cheered about, but I think it was beneficial in the way that it put a spotlight on the healthcare system issue that I think is probably the most important in the country, and how much it affects everyday people. It got people talking.”
People Over Profit NYC, a grassroots healthcare reform group focused on Mangione’s case, organized a rally outside the courthouse. Their display included a homemade spinning wheel with slots reading “APPROVED” and “DENIED” — spin the wheel to learn the fate of your insurance claim. There were Luigi hats, keychains, DIY T-shirts, and flyers about local healthcare legislation. However, when I arrived shortly after 8 AM, reporters and news crews outnumbered rally attendees. Attendance appeared to dip compared to six months ago.
Public Sentiment & Political Climate
A POPNYC rally attendee, who wished to remain anonymous due to the current political climate, noted that “protest fatigue” could be a reason for the lower attendance; the early morning timeslot might also have contributed. “I think people are just tired, and they want to either ignore what’s going on or just give up,” the attendee said. “That’s why we’re out here, to let them know we’re still here. Even if you’re tired, we’ll still go on. And maybe they’ll join us next time.”
Moreover, the timing of the hearing comes just a week after right-wing provocateur Charlie Kirk was killed at a public event in Utah. Though the two cases are not obviously connected, there has been a swift and brutal crackdown from the American right wing, targeting anyone deemed to be “celebrating” Kirk’s murder. This climate might contribute to supporters of Mangione being hesitant to show their faces in public.
Complexities of the Case
Mangione’s case presents unique challenges when it comes to keeping major events and causes in the news. He stands accused of stalking and shooting Thompson point-blank. While Mangione has pleaded not guilty, UnitedHealth Group has been particularly aggressive against critics, targeting filmmakers, social media users, and news outlets. Additionally, tech companies are actively moderating Mangione-related content, with some supporters complaining about their materials being taken down without explanation. Amid all this, the specter of violence looms over US political discourse, making it a particularly perilous time for someone in Mangione’s position.
Interestingly, public engagement with the case often comes through images of Mangione that portray him in a certain light, masking the severity of his alleged crimes. Coverage seems to strike a tonal disconnect, as outlets like the Daily Mail run articles about his “sick” fans while simultaneously creating lengthy slideshows showcasing his appearance.
Courtroom Drama and Developments
During Tuesday’s hearing, Mangione appeared in a khaki prison outfit instead of street clothes, shackled at the ankles, wrists, and waist — something his attorneys have protested. As I waited for him to enter, another reporter remarked that it felt somewhat like a wedding: both the press and a handful of attendees kept glancing back at the slightest of noises, awaiting his arrival. A supporter who made it inside the courtroom later shared that she could hear his shackles before she even saw him. Observers often focus on his demeanor, but the reality is that these court dates have so far felt very normal.
Judicial Outcomes and Next Steps
The most significant development from the hearing brought favorable news for Mangione: Judge Gregory Carro announced the dismissal of two major terrorism-related charges against him. Carro pointed out that the state had insufficient evidence to support claims that Thompson’s murder was aimed at intimidating or coercing a civilian population, clarifying that Mangione’s expressed animus toward UHC did not equate to an intent to incite fear.
Interestingly, as Carro announced the dismissal of the terrorism charges, a few supporters in the courtroom reacted audibly — perhaps a faint exclamation or even a gentle clap, which drew a scolding from a guard.
On various other motions, Mangione’s defense did not find as much success. Apart from the New York case, he faces a separate state case in Pennsylvania and a federal case, with his attorneys arguing that being prosecuted concurrently violates the principle of double jeopardy. Carro denied this argument, along with a request from Mangione’s lawyers to prioritize the federal case, which carries a death penalty risk, over the state case. The next hearing is scheduled for December 1st, with a follow-up for the federal case shortly thereafter.
The Interconnectedness of Fate and Public Persona
Luigi Mangione’s fate and his public persona are deeply intertwined. Ongoing attention on his case relies on how often he can appear in the digital feeds of the public. His court appearances, currently scheduled only once every few months, limit these opportunities. Moreover, the spectacle of his case continues to unfold: Mangione’s attorneys have prominently objected to his shackling during public appearances, saying it prejudices his right to a fair trial.
One avenue being explored by Mangione supporters is jury nullification, a scenario in which a jury might acquit despite believing the defendant committed a crime. However, even this approach requires a broad outreach effort in a time characterized by short attention spans and fragmented media landscapes.
As noted previously, a cycle appears to be shaping: One day, Mangione is the center of attention on social media; the next, he has vanished. The stakes couldn’t be higher, and the cultural climate couldn’t be more capricious. The question remains: Is becoming a meme — whether adored or despised — enough to spare someone’s life?
For further insights into this ongoing story, you can visit Here.
Image Credit: www.theverge.com